Code Review
The Ultimate Guide to Modern Code Review
In the fast-paced world of software development, code review often becomes a bottleneck. Developers wait days for feedback, context switching kills productivity, and "LGTM" becomes a stamp of approval rather than a meaningful critique.
But it does not have to be this way. Modern code review strategies can actually speed up development while improving quality.
1. Small, Atomic Commits
The golden rule of code review is simple: keep it small. A 200-line PR is easy to review thoroughly. A 2000-line PR is impossible.
- Aim for PRs that can be reviewed in under 15 minutes.
- Split refactors from feature work.
- Use stacked diffs (more on this in our Git Workflow guide) to break down complex features.
2. Automate the Boring Stuff
Humans are terrible at catching syntax errors, style violations, and unused imports. Computers are great at it.
Use tools like ESLint, Prettier, and automated testing in your CI/CD pipeline. Your human reviewers should focus on architecture, logic, and maintainability—not missing semicolons.
3. The "Nit" Culture
Distinguish between blocking issues and "nits" (minor suggestions).
Preface your comments with labels like [NIT], [QUESTION], or [BLOCKING].
This reduces anxiety for the author and clarifies what needs to be fixed before merging.
4. Use AI (Wisely)
AI agents like Axon can now perform the first pass of a code review. They can catch potential bugs, suggest performance improvements, and even identify security vulnerabilities instantly.
By letting AI handle the initial review, human reviewers can step in with a clearer context and focus on high-level design decisions.
Conclusion
Modern code review is about collaboration, not gatekeeping. By keeping PRs small, automating the basics, and leveraging AI, you can turn code review into your team's superpower.
Share this Guide:
More Guides
API Gateway Showdown: Kong vs Ambassador vs AWS API Gateway for Microservices
Compare Kong, Ambassador, and AWS API Gateway across architecture, performance, security, and cost to choose the right gateway for your microservices.
12 min readGitHub Actions vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins: The Ultimate CI/CD Platform Comparison for 2026
Compare GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins across architecture, scalability, cost, and security to choose the best CI/CD platform for your team in 2026.
7 min readKafka vs RabbitMQ vs EventBridge: Complete Messaging Backbone Comparison
Compare Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and AWS EventBridge across throughput, latency, delivery guarantees, and operational complexity to choose the right event-driven architecture for your use case.
4 min readChaos Engineering: A Practical Guide to Failure Injection and System Resilience
Learn how to implement chaos engineering using the scientific method: define steady state, form hypotheses, inject failures, and verify system resilience. This practical guide covers application and infrastructure-level failure injection patterns with code examples.
4 min readScaling PostgreSQL for High-Traffic: Read Replicas, Sharding, and Connection Pooling Strategies
Master PostgreSQL horizontal scaling with read replicas, sharding with Citus, and connection pooling. Learn practical implementation strategies to handle high-traffic workloads beyond single-server limits.
4 min readContinue Reading
API Gateway Showdown: Kong vs Ambassador vs AWS API Gateway for Microservices
Compare Kong, Ambassador, and AWS API Gateway across architecture, performance, security, and cost to choose the right gateway for your microservices.
12 min readGitHub Actions vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins: The Ultimate CI/CD Platform Comparison for 2026
Compare GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins across architecture, scalability, cost, and security to choose the best CI/CD platform for your team in 2026.
7 min readKafka vs RabbitMQ vs EventBridge: Complete Messaging Backbone Comparison
Compare Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and AWS EventBridge across throughput, latency, delivery guarantees, and operational complexity to choose the right event-driven architecture for your use case.
4 min read