Cybersecurity & Compliance
Container Security Best Practices: Complete Guide to Scanning, Signing, and Runtime Protection
Container Security Best Practices: Scanning, Signing, and Runtime Protection
Secure containerized applications by implementing defense-in-depth across the build, ship, and run phases. This guide covers image vulnerability scanning, cryptographic signing for supply chain integrity, and runtime protection mechanisms.
Image Scanning
Scan container images at every stage of the CI/CD pipeline to identify and remediate vulnerabilities before deployment. Use static analysis tools to detect known CVEs, misconfigurations, and embedded secrets.
Base Image Selection
Use minimal base images to reduce attack surface. Prefer distroless images, Alpine Linux, or Ubuntu Minimal over full-fat distributions.
# Multi-stage build with distroless base
FROM golang:1.21-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 go build -o app
FROM gcr.io/distroless/static-debian12
COPY --from=builder /app/app /app
CMD ["/app"]
Vulnerability Thresholds
Configure scanners to fail builds based on severity levels. Block images with Critical or High CVEs in production environments.
# Trivy scan configuration example
severity:
- CRITICAL
- HIGH
exit-code: 1
ignore-unfixed: true
Continuous Scanning
Integrate scanning into CI/CD pipelines and registry hooks. Rescan images periodically to catch newly disclosed vulnerabilities in deployed containers.
Image Signing
Implement cryptographic signing to establish image provenance and ensure supply chain integrity. Use public key infrastructure (PKI) to verify image authenticity before deployment.
Signing with Cosign
Sign OCI artifacts using Sigstore's Cosign tool. Attach signatures as metadata to container manifests.
# Generate keypair
cosign generate-key-pair
# Sign image
cosign sign --key cosign.key registry.example.com/app:v1.0.0
# Verify image
cosign verify --key cosign.pub registry.example.com/app:v1.0.0
Admission Control
Configure Kubernetes admission controllers to block unsigned or improperly signed images.
# Kyverno policy example
apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
kind: ClusterPolicy
metadata:
name: verify-image-signature
spec:
validationFailureAction: enforce
background: false
rules:
- name: verify-signature
match:
resources:
kinds:
- Pod
verifyImages:
- image: "registry.example.com/*"
key: |-
-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----
MFkwEwYHKoZIzj0CAQYIKoZIzj0DAQcDQgAE...
-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
Keyless Signing
Use Fulcio certificate authority and Rekor transparency log for keyless signing, eliminating private key management overhead.
Runtime Protection
Enforce security boundaries during container execution using Linux kernel features and monitoring tools. Detect and respond to anomalous behavior in real-time.
Security Contexts
Configure pod and container security contexts to limit privileges and capabilities.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: secure-pod
spec:
securityContext:
runAsNonRoot: true
runAsUser: 1000
fsGroup: 2000
containers:
- name: app
image: registry.example.com/app:v1.0.0
securityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
capabilities:
drop:
- ALL
seccompProfile:
type: RuntimeDefault
Seccomp Profiles
Restrict system calls using seccomp filters. Apply profiles based on application requirements rather than allowing all syscalls.
{
"defaultAction": "SCMP_ACT_ERRNO",
"syscalls": [
{
"names": ["read", "write", "open", "close", "exit"],
"action": "SCMP_ACT_ALLOW"
}
]
}
eBPF Monitoring
Deploy eBPF-based monitoring tools like Falco to detect suspicious behavior at the kernel level.
# Falco rule example
- rule: Shell in container
desc: A shell was spawned in a container
condition: >
spawned_process and
container and
shell_procs and
proc.pname exists
output: >
Shell spawned in container (user=%user.name container=%container.name shell=%proc.name parent=%proc.pname cmdline=%proc.cmdline)
priority: WARNING
Network Policies
Implement Kubernetes network policies to restrict pod-to-pod communication based on namespace and labels.
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: deny-all-ingress
spec:
podSelector: {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
Getting Started
- Integrate scanning: Add Trivy or Snyk to CI/CD pipeline with severity-based fail thresholds
- Implement signing: Set up Cosign with a signing workflow and configure admission controller
- Enable runtime protections: Apply security contexts, network policies, and deploy Falco for monitoring
Share this Guide:
More Guides
API Gateway Showdown: Kong vs Ambassador vs AWS API Gateway for Microservices
Compare Kong, Ambassador, and AWS API Gateway across architecture, performance, security, and cost to choose the right gateway for your microservices.
12 min readGitHub Actions vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins: The Ultimate CI/CD Platform Comparison for 2026
Compare GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins across architecture, scalability, cost, and security to choose the best CI/CD platform for your team in 2026.
7 min readKafka vs RabbitMQ vs EventBridge: Complete Messaging Backbone Comparison
Compare Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and AWS EventBridge across throughput, latency, delivery guarantees, and operational complexity to choose the right event-driven architecture for your use case.
4 min readChaos Engineering: A Practical Guide to Failure Injection and System Resilience
Learn how to implement chaos engineering using the scientific method: define steady state, form hypotheses, inject failures, and verify system resilience. This practical guide covers application and infrastructure-level failure injection patterns with code examples.
4 min readScaling PostgreSQL for High-Traffic: Read Replicas, Sharding, and Connection Pooling Strategies
Master PostgreSQL horizontal scaling with read replicas, sharding with Citus, and connection pooling. Learn practical implementation strategies to handle high-traffic workloads beyond single-server limits.
4 min readContinue Reading
API Gateway Showdown: Kong vs Ambassador vs AWS API Gateway for Microservices
Compare Kong, Ambassador, and AWS API Gateway across architecture, performance, security, and cost to choose the right gateway for your microservices.
12 min readGitHub Actions vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins: The Ultimate CI/CD Platform Comparison for 2026
Compare GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins across architecture, scalability, cost, and security to choose the best CI/CD platform for your team in 2026.
7 min readKafka vs RabbitMQ vs EventBridge: Complete Messaging Backbone Comparison
Compare Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and AWS EventBridge across throughput, latency, delivery guarantees, and operational complexity to choose the right event-driven architecture for your use case.
4 min read